visa antitrust law suit |
|||
The Best visa antitrust law suit websiteAll the visa antitrust law suit information you need to know about is right
here. Presented and researched by http://www.lawmeet.com. We've searched
the information super highway far and wide to provide you with the
best visa antitrust law suit site on the internet today. The links below will
assist you in your efforts to find the information that you are looking
for about
visa antitrust law suit
visa antitrust law suit
The Web has evolved into a global electronic publishing medium and increasingly, a medium for conducting electronic commerce in areas such as visa antitrust law suit. Electronic commerce means that you can purchase visa antitrust law suit products online. One of the major downsides of the Internet is that ignorant people may pose as quasi-experts. If someone states they are a visa antitrust law suit authority then that statement is certainly open to dispute. Organizations who specialize in the production and marketing of visa antitrust law suit are more likely to know what they are doing then a quasi visa antitrust law suit expert. We have devoted a lot of time and resources to locating the most reliable visa antitrust law suit suppliers from a large list of visa antitrust law suit websites. If you click on the links and banners of this page then you'll enter the most appropriate area for visa antitrust law suit purchases. Is Reinstating The Draft Such a Bad Idea? by: Jean Fritz
In his bid for the presidency, John Kerry pronounced a "secret plan" to reinstate selective service. The fact that New York Democrat and fellow leftist Charles Rangel had proposed this plan wasn't mentioned, so Kerry's allegation created hysteria within the blue states. But there are several ways in which reinstating the draft could benefit our country. FREEDOM IS EARNED Too many people in the United States believe that the freedoms granted them under the Constitution are an entitlement program provided by the government. A general paucity of historical education, combined with a public education agenda derogatory to the Founding Fathers as well as God, contribute to this attitude. The fact is, the Founding Fathers understood that codifying our freedoms within a constitution was only part of the picture, but our freedoms are ultimately earned and protected through military preparedness and the judicious use of force, generation after generation. The reinstatement of selective service creates the opportunity for every citizen to participate in the protection of the freedoms they hold dear, and having thus participated, would contribute to a greater appreciation of and gratitude for those freedoms. ECONOMIC BENEFITS One reason that war has traditionally created a phenomenal decline in the unemployment rate is that during a war, a large section of the workforce is taken out of the labor market. By reinstating the draft, unemployed young people would in fact become employed, and would no longer be counted among the jobless. Within that population, there are many with limited to no job experience or skill development. During peacetime, military service can help young people develop their skills and become more focused on "what they want to be when they grow up." Military service is a more effective career development tool than is a series of low-paying, dead-end jobs. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY OBLIGATIONS Unlike many conservatives, I firmly believe that women as well as men should have military obligations. If we women truly want to claim equality under the law, we have an obligation equal to that of men to protect and defend the Constitution which allows us to make that claim. Women in the United States have the right to vote, to own property, to receive an education, to work outside the home, to pray, and to speak our minds on social policy. Why should we be exempt from action when those rights are threatened? Feminists fought long and hard to allow women to serve in combat roles; including women in selective service call-ups is the logical result. DEFENDING THE SECOND AMENDMENT Gun control advocates use the excuse that the average citizen shouldn't own guns, as the Constitution only guarantees the right to bear arms to those involved in a "well-regulated militia." Having every citizen actually be a soldier eliminates this argument. Plus, having more law-abiding people actually trained in the effective use of firearms would certainly contribute to the safety and security of cities and towns across the country. The United States is one of the only countries that does not mandate military service for its citizens. Our partner and ally, Israel, has always expected its citizens to be prepared, trained, and ready to defend itself against the burgeoning monster of terrorism. Since the events of 9/11, shouldn't we begin to think along those same lines?
|
|||
|
http://www.meetingsonthenet.com/ |
|||
| Go Meetings Medical Newscast Present On The Net |